Level 4, 20 Grenfell Street,
Adelaide SA  5000

Phone: 08 8231 1888
Fax: 08 8231 3888

Email: admin@crase.com.au


Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

 
Latest News
Hot Issues
Write a business plan
Two Cautionary Tales About Resources Important to Anyone Using a Domain Name or Website
What Are the Privacy Policy Requirements for Australian E-Commerce Businesses?
Privacy Compliance Sweep 2026: Is Your Business Ready?
Foreign investor fined $370k as ATO cracks whip on land banking
The AI moment in accounting will follow a familiar pattern
Latest Intergenerational Report points to stubborn productivity issues that AI cannot fix
Check out the smartest species on earth: Data from 200M BC to 2026
Steps to close a business
Paid parental leave super contributions have started
How Do I Write Legally Compliant Terms and Conditions for My Business?
Don’t get caught out at tax time with your multiple jobs
Division 296 tax on large super balances
More of the same with latest missive from Treasury
'No place to hide': ATO puts contractors on notice over $1bn in missing TPAR payments
Check out the largest castles by country
ATO no longer treating debt the same as during COVID
Warning for early lodger this tax time!
Global companies turn to cost-cutting amid ongoing inflation
Don’t get caught out at tax time with your multiples jobs
Does Your Small Business Need to Follow AML Privacy Rules?
SMEs warned as ATO ramps up tax debt collection
Taxpayer given 35% penalty for BAS recklessness
How Our Diets have Changed.
Tips to help you this tax time
Tax Time Checklists Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
ATO warns millions of Australian chasing tax deductions to stop making 'unusual' claims
Impersonation scams are on the rise
Components of a cyber security plan
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2026
Quarter 2 April - June 2026
Quarter 1 January - March 2026
Quarter 4 October - December 2025
Quarter 3 July - September 2025
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Bribery, brothels, breaches of confidence: ATO officer loses appeal against imprisonment

A former ATO client engagement officer has lost an appeal against a five-year prison sentence for accepting a $100,000 bribe in return for a favourable tax audit.



.


On 12 March 2024, former ATO client engagement officer Wenfeng Wei was sentenced to five years in prison after breaching the Commonwealth Criminal Code on multiple occasions.


He accepted bribes in return for favourable audits and illegally accessed restricted ATO data on associates’ competitors in what the courts described as a “gross abuse of trust.”


In May 2016, Wei was assigned to audit the taxation affairs of Raymond Schlemon and his company, Global World Group.


That August, Schlemon gave Wei a $100,000 cash bribe. In return, Wei undertook the audit in a way that “significantly favoured Shlemon,” assessing him for outstanding tax liabilities of $136,290, when the audit ought to have identified income tax and GST shortfalls of just over $6 million.


Wei, who also had a gambling addiction, laundered the money through casinos to provide an “ostensible source for the money,” court documents said.


He also accessed restricted ATO data concerning Shlemon in an unauthorised way more than 500 times between April 2017 and February 2022. He communicated with Shlemon before, during and after these ‘episodes’ of unauthorised access.


Wei engaged in similar activities relating to another associate, Chao Chang, who operated a brothel in Sydney’s Surry Hills known as The Ginza Club.


The former ATO officer accessed restricted government data relating to Chang and his business interests over 900 times between August 2017 and March 2020.


Furthermore, at the request of Chang, Wei accessed restricted ATO data on a competitor of Chang’s on 294 occasions. This included personal details, information regarding property transactions, shareholdings and tax returns of the competitor.


The judge described this conduct as “particularly concerning because of the breach of confidence in circumstances where [the competitor] was entitled to expect that a public organisation would protect her from competitors and the gross abuse of trust involved,” court documents read. 


"The offending involved a gross violation of [the competitor’s] privacy as well as of the ATO system.”


Wei was sentenced to five years in prison, with a non-parole period of two years and six months. The sentence commenced on 12 March 2024 and is set to expire on 11 March 2029.


The former ATO officer launched an appeal against his sentence, arguing that the sentencing judge had failed to consider his “contrition and remorse,” and his sentence should be reduced as he had pleaded guilty and co-operated with authorities.


Last Wednesday (24 September), the NSW Supreme Court rejected his appeal, finding that Wei’s cooperation had not warranted further reductions in his sentence, given that his early guilty plea had already resulted in a 25 per cent reduction in his sentence.


In fact, the judges said that they likely would have given him a stronger sentence, given the nature of his conduct.


“Were I to resentence, I too would impose a materially higher sentence for the bribery offence, even taking into account the evidence adduced on the usual basis against the possibility that this Court might resentence,” Justice Mark Leeming noted.


“That is because the offending was serious and sustained, and the errors identified by the applicant are relatively minor in terms of their impact on the process of formulating the appropriate sentence.”


 


 


 


 


 


Emma Partis
29 September 2025
accountantsdaily.com.au




30th-October-2025
      Site By AcctWeb